Publications
Multi-scale integrated evaluation of the sustainability of large-scale use of alternative feeds in salmon aquaculture Journal Article
Cadillo-Benalcazar, Juan J.; Giampietro, Mario; Bukkens, Sandra G. F.; Strand, Roger
In: Journal of Cleaner Production, 248 , pp. 119210, 2020, ISSN: 09596526.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Alternative aquafeeds, Insects, MuSIASEM, Norway, Quantitative story-telling, Salmon aquaculture
@article{Cadillo-Benalcazar2020a,
title = {Multi-scale integrated evaluation of the sustainability of large-scale use of alternative feeds in salmon aquaculture},
author = {Juan J. Cadillo-Benalcazar and Mario Giampietro and Sandra G. F. Bukkens and Roger Strand},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652619340806},
doi = {10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119210},
issn = {09596526},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-03-01},
journal = {Journal of Cleaner Production},
volume = {248},
pages = {119210},
publisher = {Elsevier Ltd},
abstract = {The steady increase in production volume of salmon aquaculture has sharpened concerns about its sustainability. In particular the production of salmon feed is a reason for concern given its reliance on scarce natural resources, such as wild fish captures. Multi-scale integrated analysis is put forward as a tool to anticipate the environmental and socio-economic impacts of large-scale implementation of alternative salmon feeds, considering both plant and insect sources as potential replacements of fish meal and fish oil. The proposed accounting framework, based on relational analysis across hierarchical levels, describes the patterns of required inputs using biophysical and economic variables. It also considers the inputs used by external systems for the production of imported feed, thus providing a coherent assessment of the sustainability of the production system in terms of feasibility, viability, and desirability. The analytical tool-kit is illustrated in conceptual terms and then applied to the Norwegian salmon aquaculture, both in diagnostic (describing the actual situation) and anticipatory mode (examining feed scenarios). Results are used in an exercise of quantitative story-telling to check the quality of the narratives currently shaping policy discussions on aquaculture. Quantitative story-telling is a heuristic approach aimed at checking the robustness of knowledge claims in face of uncertainty. It is concluded that rearing insects in the salmon feed production chain enlarges the option space of feed sources by opening up the possibility of using locally-produced seaweed and organic waste, but also raises the level of uncertainty with regard to the possible insurgence of negative side effects.},
keywords = {Alternative aquafeeds, Insects, MuSIASEM, Norway, Quantitative story-telling, Salmon aquaculture},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
The steady increase in production volume of salmon aquaculture has sharpened concerns about its sustainability. In particular the production of salmon feed is a reason for concern given its reliance on scarce natural resources, such as wild fish captures. Multi-scale integrated analysis is put forward as a tool to anticipate the environmental and socio-economic impacts of large-scale implementation of alternative salmon feeds, considering both plant and insect sources as potential replacements of fish meal and fish oil. The proposed accounting framework, based on relational analysis across hierarchical levels, describes the patterns of required inputs using biophysical and economic variables. It also considers the inputs used by external systems for the production of imported feed, thus providing a coherent assessment of the sustainability of the production system in terms of feasibility, viability, and desirability. The analytical tool-kit is illustrated in conceptual terms and then applied to the Norwegian salmon aquaculture, both in diagnostic (describing the actual situation) and anticipatory mode (examining feed scenarios). Results are used in an exercise of quantitative story-telling to check the quality of the narratives currently shaping policy discussions on aquaculture. Quantitative story-telling is a heuristic approach aimed at checking the robustness of knowledge claims in face of uncertainty. It is concluded that rearing insects in the salmon feed production chain enlarges the option space of feed sources by opening up the possibility of using locally-produced seaweed and organic waste, but also raises the level of uncertainty with regard to the possible insurgence of negative side effects.
Renner, Ansel; Giampietro, Mario
In: Energy Research & Social Science, 59 , pp. 101279, 2020, ISSN: 22146296.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Complexity, Electricity, Quantitative story-telling, Renewable energy, Storage
@article{Renner2020a,
title = {Socio-technical discourses of European electricity decarbonization: Contesting narrative credibility and legitimacy with quantitative story-telling},
author = {Ansel Renner and Mario Giampietro},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214629619302968},
doi = {10.1016/j.erss.2019.101279},
issn = {22146296},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Energy Research & Social Science},
volume = {59},
pages = {101279},
abstract = {This paper presents an innovative approach to the responsible use of quantitative analysis when dealing with the governance of sustainability. Rather than using complicated models which try to predict and control the future evolution of complex adaptive systems, quantitative story-telling is proposed to check, first of all, the plausibility of proposed policies. As a case study, we check the plausibility of ‘a radical decarbonization of the European economy based on a quick deployment of alternative sources of electrical energy generation'. Although our case study includes a high-level set of quantitative results, it is primarily methodological. The procedure of quantitative story-telling includes: (1) identification of the narratives used to inform policy; (2) identification of the relevant factors determining the feasibility, viability and desirability of expected results; (3) a quantitative analysis which falsifies at least one of these three factors, indicating an implausibility of the expected results; and (4) identification of knowledge gaps in the existing discussions over the issue. The modern European energy system does need an urgent and radical transformation. However, before imposing drastic and ambitious policies, it is essential to check the quality of the diagnosis. Our analysis flags the existence of a few reasons for concern with regard to the current story-telling.},
keywords = {Complexity, Electricity, Quantitative story-telling, Renewable energy, Storage},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This paper presents an innovative approach to the responsible use of quantitative analysis when dealing with the governance of sustainability. Rather than using complicated models which try to predict and control the future evolution of complex adaptive systems, quantitative story-telling is proposed to check, first of all, the plausibility of proposed policies. As a case study, we check the plausibility of ‘a radical decarbonization of the European economy based on a quick deployment of alternative sources of electrical energy generation'. Although our case study includes a high-level set of quantitative results, it is primarily methodological. The procedure of quantitative story-telling includes: (1) identification of the narratives used to inform policy; (2) identification of the relevant factors determining the feasibility, viability and desirability of expected results; (3) a quantitative analysis which falsifies at least one of these three factors, indicating an implausibility of the expected results; and (4) identification of knowledge gaps in the existing discussions over the issue. The modern European energy system does need an urgent and radical transformation. However, before imposing drastic and ambitious policies, it is essential to check the quality of the diagnosis. Our analysis flags the existence of a few reasons for concern with regard to the current story-telling.
AGAUR Grant ID 2017 SGR 230 / Copyright © 2023