Publications

@article{Cabello2018,

title = {Unravelling narratives of water management: Reflections on epistemic uncertainty in the first cycle of implementation of the Water Framework Directive in southern Spain},

author = {Violeta Cabello and Zora Kovacic and Nora Van Cauwenbergh},

url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1462901117306779},

doi = {10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.019},

issn = {14629011},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-07-01},

journal = {Environmental Science & Policy},

volume = {85},

pages = {19--27},

publisher = {Elsevier},

abstract = {The participatory planning model promoted by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) leads to the emergence of new questions on how to define problems, how to know if something is a problem and for whom. We propose the concept of epistemic uncertainty to assess adaptive governance in the context of broadening of narratives about how water should be managed. For this purpose, we analyse how framings of the problem-solution duality with regards to water management evolve throughout the first cycle of implementation of the WFD in a semi-arid river basin in Southern Spain. We identify five narratives on water management: supply-side management, demand-side management, deep ecology, rural livelihoods and knowledge and governance. The paper contributes to the adaptive governance literature by arguing that epistemic uncertainty cannot be treated as a technical problem, and dealing with pluralism and accommodating evolving narratives are essential to adaptability in governance. We submit that the implementation of the WFD should take into account stakeholders' uneven capacities to influence water management and the hindrances to implementation that ensue. With regard to the study area, we find that (i) narrative pluralism is handled through ambiguity and coalition strategies based on large infrastructural investments, traditional in the Spanish context, (ii) unexpected events such as the economic crisis had greater influence on water management than participatory processes, and (iii) little evolution was observed in the perception of problems after implementation of the plan and mistrust of the water administration rose during the period analysed.},

keywords = {Adaptive governance, Epistemic uncertainty, Narratives, Participatory planning, Pluralism, Water Framework Directive},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Kovacic2017a,

title = {Investigating science for governance through the lenses of complexity},

author = {Zora Kovacic},

url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016328717300423},

doi = {10.1016/j.futures.2017.01.007},

issn = {00163287},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-08-01},

journal = {Futures},

volume = {91},

pages = {80--83},

publisher = {Pergamon},

abstract = {This paper assesses the contributions of complexity theory to post-normal science. The oversupply of facts in science for governance is explained as a matter of complexity, defined as irreducible pluralism in the knowledge base. The paper shows how complexity provides an interface to engage with the multiple facts of science through three different examples. First, water narratives are used to show how different scales of analysis produce contradictory scientific representations of the same system. Second, smart electricity grids are assessed to demonstrate how different levels of uncertainty are associated with different representations. Third, the case of slum upgrading is used to discuss the need to take into account stakes in science for governance.},

keywords = {Complexity, Pluralism, Post-normal science, Post-truth, Science for policy, Uncertainty},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}