Publications
Sustainable Development Indicators: From Statistics to Policy Journal Article
Garnåsjordet, Per Arild; Aslaksen, Iulie; Giampietro, Mario; Funtowicz, Silvio; Ericson, Torgeir
In: Environmental Policy and Governance, 22 (5), pp. 322–336, 2012, ISSN: 1756932X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Policy, Statistical narratives, Sustainability assessment, Sustainable development indicators
@article{Garnasjordet2012,
title = {Sustainable Development Indicators: From Statistics to Policy},
author = {Per Arild Garnr{a}sjordet and Iulie Aslaksen and Mario Giampietro and Silvio Funtowicz and Torgeir Ericson},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.1597},
doi = {10.1002/eet.1597},
issn = {1756932X},
year = {2012},
date = {2012-09-01},
journal = {Environmental Policy and Governance},
volume = {22},
number = {5},
pages = {322--336},
abstract = {Sustainable development indicators (SDIs) may have good potential to bring environmental concerns to the policy agenda. However, different understandings of sustainability, definitions of SDIs and measurement procedures may give completely different assessments of whether society moves towards a sustainable development path or not. Compilation of statistical indicators for environmental change and sustainability comprises not only a selection of facts in some technical sense, as the choices involved are conditioned by societal interests and implicit values embedded in the data-generating processes. This implies that statistical offices cannot ignore the role that values play in the generation of accurate data sets. To give an assessment of sustainability, we need not only to address historical trends but also to evaluate policy choices made today and how they may influence future development. SDI sets should be evaluated according to how they contribute to deliberation on sustainability in learning processes involving participants beyond the science-policy interface. textcopyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.},
keywords = {Policy, Statistical narratives, Sustainability assessment, Sustainable development indicators},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Sustainable development indicators (SDIs) may have good potential to bring environmental concerns to the policy agenda. However, different understandings of sustainability, definitions of SDIs and measurement procedures may give completely different assessments of whether society moves towards a sustainable development path or not. Compilation of statistical indicators for environmental change and sustainability comprises not only a selection of facts in some technical sense, as the choices involved are conditioned by societal interests and implicit values embedded in the data-generating processes. This implies that statistical offices cannot ignore the role that values play in the generation of accurate data sets. To give an assessment of sustainability, we need not only to address historical trends but also to evaluate policy choices made today and how they may influence future development. SDI sets should be evaluated according to how they contribute to deliberation on sustainability in learning processes involving participants beyond the science-policy interface. textcopyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
AGAUR Grant ID 2017 SGR 230 / Copyright © 2023